Gabriel Schmidt vs Johannes Bangratz Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W L W L
Form
L L L W L W L L L LH2H: Schmidt 2 - 0 Bangratz
They have played 4 sets in total, with Schmidt winning 4 and Bangratz winning 0. The last match between Schmidt and Bangratz was at the Austria F1 (Telfs), 02-07-2018, First, Clay with Gabriel Schmidt getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gabriel Schmidt | 2 |
| Johannes Bangratz | 0 |
Austria F1 (Telfs)(02-07-2018)
6
4
6
1
| Schmidt | Stats | Bangratz |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 33 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 63% (74-44) | Career Total W/L | 46% (31-37) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Comesana VS Fils PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Gabriel Schmidt
Player
Johannes Bangratz
92%
(
56 of
61)
1st Serve %
93%
(
52 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:46:30 | Average Match Time | 0:46:30 |
| 92% (56/61) | 1st Serve % | 93% (52/56) |
| 64% (36/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (27/52) |
| 60% (3/5) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 9% (1/11) |
| 48% (27/56) | Return Points Win % | 36% (22/61) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gabriel Schmidt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Goldsteiner
Player
Gabriel Schmidt
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Schmidt
Player
Frederico Gil
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Schmidt
Player
Goncalo Falcao
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Gabriel Schmidt
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
14
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Gabriel Schmidt
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alessandro Petrone
Player
Gabriel Schmidt
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Schmidt
Player
Filip Duda
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Johannes Bangratz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Johannes Bangratz
84%
(
69 of
82)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Battaglino
Player
Johannes Bangratz
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (74/44) | Win/Loss | 46% (31/37) |
| 61% (158/101) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (73/82) |
| 56% (1282/1021) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (680/687) |
| 64% (7/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (65/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 42% (23/32) |
| 22% (2/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (8/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 29 | Aces Total | 39 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 48 | Total Double Faults | 64 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 303.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 282.94 |
| 67% (1151/1729) | 1st Serve % | 59% (745/1258) |
| 63% (727/1151) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (472/745) |
| 52% (299/578) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (246/513) |
| 43% (78/180) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (61/156) |
| 41% (728/1780) | Return Points Win % | 41% (518/1260) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (74/44) | Futures W/L | 46% (31/37) |
| 63% (73/116) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (30/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 46% (6/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 57% (13/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (7/18) |
| 92% (72/66) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (29/24) |
| 8% (72/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (29/5) |
| 17% (46/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (39/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
